Choosing Wait vs Pause Until

Wait and Pause Until both delay progression, but they solve different problems. Choosing the right one makes the Journey easier to reason about and more accurate in practice.

At a glance

Wait

Pause Until

Trigger

Elapsed time

Condition (event or profile change)

Paths out

One β€” continues after the duration

Two β€” condition met, or timeout

Reacts early?

No β€” always waits the full duration

Yes β€” continues as soon as condition is met

Timeout required?

No β€” duration is always fixed

Recommended β€” prevents indefinite waits

Complexity

Low

Higher β€” two paths must be connected

Best for

Fixed delays between steps

Event-driven sequencing with a fallback

Choose Wait when

  • The next step should happen after a fixed duration

  • The business rule is time-based or calendar-based

  • You do not need to react to a condition

Examples:

  • Wait 2 days after signup before sending a follow-up

  • Wait until next Monday at 09:00 to hit an inbox during business hours

  • Wait 1 week before a check-in message

Choose Pause Until when

  • Progression depends on an event or a profile change

  • You want to continue immediately when a condition is met, rather than waiting a fixed duration

  • You want a fallback path if the condition never happens

Examples:

  • Pause until a purchase event occurs β†’ continue down the conversion path; send a re-engagement message on 7-day timeout

  • Pause until onboarding_complete = true β†’ continue to the next step; escalate on 14-day timeout

  • Pause until an email open event β†’ send a follow-up; re-route on 3-day timeout

The practical rule

Wait = time-based delay Pause Until = condition-based delay

If the question is "how long should I wait?" β€” use Wait. If the question is "what should I wait for?" β€” use Pause Until.

Common mistakes

Using Pause Until for a fixed delay

The mistake: configuring a Pause Until with no real condition β€” just setting a timeout and relying on that to delay progression.

Why it's a problem: This adds the complexity of two outgoing paths (condition met and timeout) without the benefit. Use Wait instead β€” it is simpler, clearer, and has no dangling second path to connect.

Using Wait when the Journey should react to an event

The mistake: using a Wait step when you actually want to continue as soon as a specific event happens.

Why it's a problem: The Journey will wait the full duration even if the event happened on day 1. Contacts who should move forward early will not β€” making the flow feel late or inaccurate. Use Pause Until with a condition, and a timeout for the fallback.

Decision guide

Last updated